Written & reviewed by NotALawyer Review AI · Updated June 26, 2026
What collectors can and can't do, how to make them prove a debt, and how much of your pay is protected.
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that applies in every state. It governs third-party debt collectors — the agencies and debt-buying companies that collect on someone else's behalf — rather than, in most cases, the original creditor collecting its own account. So if a collection agency or a company that bought your old debt is the one contacting you, the FDCPA almost certainly covers that contact.
The law draws hard lines around how collectors can behave. They generally can't call you at unusual or inconvenient hours — the default window is roughly 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. in your local time. They can't harass you, use obscene language, or call over and over just to wear you down. They can't lie about who they are or what you owe, and they can't discuss your debt with your boss, neighbors, or relatives.
You also have a tool many people don't know about: you can tell a collector to stop contacting you, and that request carries legal weight when you put it in writing. Once they receive it, they generally must stop — except to confirm they'll stop, or to notify you of a specific step like a lawsuit. The CFPB and the FTC both publish plain-language explanations of these rights.
It pays to keep records from the first call onward — dates, who called, what was said, and copies of every letter. The FDCPA gives consumers the right to take a collector who breaks these rules to court, and good notes are what turn a vague complaint into something you can act on. You can also report problem collectors to the CFPB and your state's consumer-protection office.
One of your strongest rights is the right to make a collector prove the debt is real, is actually yours, and is the right amount. Within five days of first contacting you, a debt collector must send a written 'validation notice' that states how much it claims you owe, names the creditor, and explains how to dispute it.
If you dispute the debt in writing within 30 days of receiving that notice, the collector generally must pause collection until it mails you verification — typically documentation showing the debt is yours and the amount is correct. This matters because debts get bought and sold, sometimes several times, and records get garbled along the way. The company chasing you may not actually be holding solid proof. Send your dispute by a method you can document, and keep a copy for yourself.
Disputing doesn't make a legitimate debt disappear — if the collector sends adequate verification, it can resume collecting. But the pause buys you time, forces the company to show its hand, and creates a paper trail. If verification never comes, or arrives with obvious gaps, that's useful to know before you decide whether to pay, negotiate, or push back.
Every state sets a statute of limitations — a deadline for how long a creditor or collector has to take you to court over an unpaid debt. Once that window closes, the debt is described as 'time-barred.' How long the clock runs depends on your state and on the kind of debt, and your state's general limitation period appears in the 'your state' panel on this page.
A time-barred debt doesn't vanish — the statute of limitations bars the lawsuit, it does not erase what you owe. A collector can still ask you to pay, and the debt may still appear on your credit report within its own separate time limits. But if a collector sues you on a debt whose deadline has passed, that expired statute of limitations is a defense you can raise in the case.
Here's the trap to watch for. In many states, making a payment — even a small one — or, in some places, simply acknowledging in writing that the debt is yours can RESTART the limitations clock, handing the collector a fresh window to sue. Old debt that's been sold off cheaply is often chased precisely in the hope you'll make a token payment and reset the timer. Before you pay anything or sign anything on a very old debt, it's worth checking where your state's clock stands.
If a collector actually files a lawsuit, the worst thing you can do is ignore it. Ignoring a debt lawsuit almost always ends in a default judgment — the court rules against you automatically because you never responded — and in most states a judgment is exactly what unlocks the heavier tools like wage garnishment and bank levies.
The move is to respond by the deadline printed on your court papers. You usually have a limited window — often somewhere around 20 to 30 days, though it varies by state and by court — to file a written response called an Answer. Responding on time preserves your defenses, including the statute-of-limitations defense and your right to make the collector prove the debt. Don't assume an old or unfamiliar debt isn't worth answering.
Many debt-collection lawsuits are filed by companies betting you won't show up. Plenty of these cases rest on thin paperwork, the wrong amount, or a debt that's past the deadline to sue — but none of that helps you if no one raises it. Filing an Answer puts the burden back on the collector to actually prove its case, and it keeps the door open to negotiate a settlement on better terms.
If you've already been served, the 'served-lawsuit' tool walks you through finding your response deadline and understanding what an Answer is, and the 'responding-to-a-lawsuit' guide covers the summons-to-Answer process in more depth.
Wage garnishment is a court-ordered deduction taken straight from your paycheck, and for ordinary consumer debt it usually happens only after a creditor has won a judgment. (A few debts, such as federal student loans and some government obligations, can be garnished without a court case first.) Federal law sets a floor on how much can be taken, and that floor applies in every state.
Under Title III of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor, garnishment for ordinary consumer debt generally can't exceed the lesser of two amounts: 25% of your disposable earnings, or the amount by which your weekly disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum wage. 'Disposable earnings' means what's left after legally required deductions, such as taxes — not after rent, car payments, or other bills.
That federal number is only a floor. A number of states protect more of your wages, and some effectively bar garnishment for most consumer debts altogether, so your actual limit may be more generous than the federal minimum. The exact figure depends on your state — see the 'your state' panel and the 50-state comparison table on this page, and the 'wage-garnishment' tool can help you estimate. Keep in mind that child support, alimony, and unpaid taxes follow different, higher limits than ordinary consumer debt.
Two more federal protections are worth knowing. Title III caps what can be taken even when more than one creditor is owed, so a single ordinary garnishment can't quietly balloon past the limit. And the same law generally bars an employer from firing you because your wages are being garnished for any one debt. If you think your paycheck is being garnished for more than the law allows, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division is the federal office that enforces these limits.
A judgment can also let a creditor levy a bank account — freezing it and pulling funds directly. But certain money is generally protected no matter what. Federal benefits are the big category: Social Security, SSI, veterans' benefits, and many other federal payments are generally shielded from garnishment by ordinary creditors, and banks are required to protect a baseline amount of those funds when they land by direct deposit.
Protection isn't always automatic, though. If exempt money gets mixed in with other funds, or a creditor freezes an account anyway, you may have to file a claim of exemption with the court to get it released — often on a tight deadline. States layer on their own exemptions too, for things like a portion of already-paid wages and certain household goods. As a hypothetical: say a retiree's only income is a $1,500 monthly Social Security deposit. That money is generally protected even if a creditor tries to levy the account — but the retiree may still need to formally assert the exemption to get the account unfrozen.
If your account is frozen, time is usually the enemy. The exemption claim often has a short deadline, and the court — not the bank — is generally the place to assert it. Keeping protected benefits in their own account, rather than commingled with other deposits, makes it far easier to show what's exempt if you ever have to prove it.
Collection accounts and judgments can show up on your credit report, and the records are wrong more often than people expect. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) gives you the right to an accurate file and a no-cost way to correct mistakes. You're entitled to free copies of your credit reports from the nationwide bureaus, and you can dispute anything inaccurate — a debt that isn't yours, a wrong balance, a duplicate listing, or an account that should have aged off.
To dispute, contact both the credit bureau reporting the error and the company that supplied the information. The bureau generally must investigate, usually within about 30 days, and correct or remove anything it can't verify. The CFPB publishes step-by-step instructions for filing a dispute. It also helps to keep accurate-but-negative items in perspective: most stay on your report for a set number of years and then fall off on their own.
Be cautious with so-called 'pay-for-delete' offers, where a collector promises to erase an accurate entry in exchange for payment — credit-reporting rules favor accuracy, and there's no guarantee the item stays gone. The cleaner path is to dispute genuine errors, get any settlement terms in writing, and let accurate items age off on the normal timeline. Watching your reports also helps you catch a new collection account before it turns into a surprise lawsuit.
Some situations call for more than self-help. If garnishments and levies are stacking up, or the debt is simply more than you can manage, it may be time to talk to a licensed attorney in your state or a reputable nonprofit credit counselor. Many consumer-rights and bankruptcy attorneys offer low-cost or free consultations, and legal aid may be able to help if your income qualifies.
Bankruptcy is a federal process that can halt garnishments and collection calls through what's called an automatic stay and, depending on the chapter you file under, discharge or restructure what you owe. It carries real long-term tradeoffs, so it's worth understanding the options before deciding. A nonprofit credit counseling agency can also help you weigh a repayment plan against other alternatives. This guide is general legal information, not legal advice — for help with your own circumstances, talk to a licensed attorney in your state.
Under federal law, the most a creditor can garnish from a paycheck for ordinary consumer debt is the lesser of 25% of your disposable (after-tax) earnings or the amount your weekly pay exceeds 30 times the federal minimum wage — so the first $217.50 of weekly take-home is always protected. States may protect more, and many do, by shielding a larger share of pay or tying the exemption to a higher state minimum wage. A few states go further and bar wage garnishment for most consumer debts entirely.
| State | Consumer-debt wage-garnishment limit | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Alaska | At least $473/week of net earnings exempt (more protective than federal) | Alaska Stat. §09.38.030 |
| Arizona | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Arkansas | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| California | Lesser of 20% of disposable pay or 40% of pay over 48× state minimum wage | Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §706.050 |
| Colorado | Lesser of 20% of disposable pay or pay over 40× minimum wage (more protective) | Colo. Rev. Stat. §13-54-104 |
| Connecticut | Lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 40× minimum wage (more protective) | Conn. Gen. Stat. §52-361a |
| Delaware | 85% of wages exempt — a creditor may take at most 15% (more protective) | Del. Code tit. 10, §4913 |
| District of Columbia | Pay up to 40× DC minimum wage exempt; only 25% of the excess garnishable | D.C. Code §16-572 |
| Florida | Head-of-family wages exempt if disposable pay is $750/week or less | Fla. Stat. §222.11 |
| Georgia | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Hawaii | Graduated state formula or the federal limit, whichever protects more pay | Haw. Rev. Stat. §652-1 |
| Idaho | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Illinois | Lesser of 15% of gross pay or pay over 45× minimum wage (more protective) | 735 ILCS 5/12-803 |
| Indiana | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Iowa | Annual dollar caps limit how much one creditor can garnish per year | Iowa Code §642.21 |
| Kansas | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Kentucky | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Louisiana | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Maine | Lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 40× minimum wage (more protective) | Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9-A, §5-105 |
| Maryland | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Massachusetts | Greater of 85% of gross wages or 50× minimum wage is exempt (more protective) | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 246, §28 |
| Michigan | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Minnesota | Greater of 75% of disposable pay or 40× minimum wage exempt; lower rates for lower earners | Minn. Stat. §571.922 |
| Mississippi | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Missouri | Head-of-household pay is 90% exempt — at most 10% garnishable (more protective) | Mo. Rev. Stat. §525.030 |
| Montana | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Nebraska | Head-of-family pay is 85% exempt — at most 15% garnishable (more protective) | Neb. Rev. Stat. §25-1558 |
| Nevada | 82% of disposable pay exempt if gross weekly pay is $770 or less (more protective) | Nev. Rev. Stat. §31.295 |
| New Hampshire | 50× minimum wage exempt; wage attachment is one-time, not a continuing garnishment | N.H. Rev. Stat. §512:21 |
| New Jersey | Capped at 10% of pay for earners up to 250% of the federal poverty level | N.J. Stat. §2A:17-50 |
| New Mexico | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| New York | Lesser of 10% of gross pay or 25% of disposable pay (more protective) | N.Y. CPLR §5231 |
| North Carolina | Most wages exempt — no wage garnishment for ordinary consumer debt | N.C. Dept. of Labor — Garnishments (N.C. Gen. Stat. §1-362) |
| North Dakota | Greater of 75% or 40× minimum wage exempt, plus $20/week per dependent | N.D. Cent. Code §32-09.1-03 |
| Ohio | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Oklahoma | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Oregon | 75% of disposable pay exempt, with a weekly dollar floor above the federal minimum | Or. Rev. Stat. §18.385 |
| Pennsylvania | Most wages exempt — consumer-debt wage garnishment effectively barred | 42 Pa. C.S. §8127 |
| Rhode Island | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| South Carolina | Most wages exempt — consumer-debt wage garnishment barred by statute | S.C. Code §37-5-104 |
| South Dakota | Pay over 40× minimum wage garnishable, minus $25/week per dependent (more protective) | S.D. Codified Laws §21-18-51 |
| Tennessee | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Texas | Most wages exempt — consumer-debt wage garnishment effectively barred | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §63.004 |
| Utah | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Vermont | Consumer debt: greater of 85% of disposable pay or 40× minimum wage exempt | 12 V.S.A. §3170 |
| Virginia | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
| Washington | Consumer debt: greater of 80% of disposable pay or 35× state minimum wage exempt | Wash. Rev. Code §6.27.150 |
| West Virginia | Consumer debt: 80% of disposable pay exempt — at most 20% garnishable (more protective) | W. Va. Code §46A-2-130 |
| Wisconsin | 80% of disposable pay exempt; fully exempt if household income is below the poverty line | Wis. Stat. §812.34 |
| Wyoming | Federal limit: lesser of 25% of disposable pay or pay over 30× minimum wage | CCPA Title III, 15 U.S.C. §1673 |
General information, not legal advice. Garnishment for child or spousal support, unpaid taxes, and student loans follows different — and usually higher — limits. Confirm the rule and the current figures with your court or a licensed attorney in your state.
More on this topic: the Consumer Rights hub
These guides are general information about the law, not legal advice for your specific situation. Talk to a licensed lawyer in your state before making decisions that affect your rights.