Not A Lawyer

Legal News, Articles and Current Event Commentary by a Non-Lawyer

Not A Lawyer header image 5

Man Wins $4 Million After Assault By Chicago Police

October 21st, 2007 · 3 Comments

Labels:

I think the Chicago police officer who assaulted this man should go on trial for sexual assault, and when found guilty he should have to register as a sex offender. What kind of sick human being puts a screwdriver into someone’s rectum?

I am glad that the man will receive $4 million. He deserves every penny of it.

, , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

→ 3 CommentsTags: Bizarre · Drugs · Personal Injury · Sex Offenders

  • Mom Turned In For Drunk Driving By 8 Year Old Son
  • OJ Simpson Arrested, In Police Custody
  • Jury Awards $2 To Utah Couple Over Family Services Misconduct
  • Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan Sued
  • Druggie Mother Throws Baby At Cop
  • Court Orders California Cities To Stop Seizing Cars

    October 14th, 2007 · No Comments

    Labels:

    The California Supreme Court has ruled that the situation that has been going on in Stockton and Oakland California must stop. The cities have been seizing the cars of people arrested for crimes involving prostitution and drugs.

    This practice of seizing the cars has been very controversial, since they were seizing and at times even selling the cars of people who had not been convicted of any crimes. Just being accused of the crime was previously enough for the car to be seized, causing the owner to have to fight to try to get it back.

    The California Supreme Court has finally ruled that after over 10 years of cars being seized during arrests, that the cities do not have the authority to do that. Innocent until proven guilty, right?

    , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

    → No CommentsTags: Drugs · Videos · Criminal Law · Law

  • The Supreme Court Death Penalty Remix
  • Tell Me You Are Not Afraid Of Tasers
  • Convicted Sex Offender Worked At FedEx
  • Homeless, Neglectful, Drug Addicted Mother Fights To Have More Kids
  • A Material Misrepresentation?
  • Homeless, Neglectful, Drug Addicted Mother Fights To Have More Kids

    September 30th, 2007 · 1 Comment

    Labels:

    In Pennsylvania, a Family Court judge ordered a homeless and drug addicted couple, who had four children in foster care due to their neglect, not to have any more children until they could straighten out their lives and get their kids back. Three of the children were born addicted to cocaine.

    While many people, including myself, would applaud the judge’s decision, she was, no doubt, in questionable legal territory.

    Stephanie Pendleton, the mother of the four children who are now in foster care, challenged the Family Court judge’s ruling and the state Supreme Court overturned the ruling. I can not imagine who would agree to be her lawyer except maybe the most liberal civil libertarian on the planet? The five judge appeals panel decided that the Family Court judge had no authority to prohibit procreation.

    The original ruling by the family court judge ordered Stephanie Pendleton and her boyfriend Rodney Evers to seek family planning services, get parental counseling and treatment for their drug addiction.

    The judge wrote, “All babies deserve more than to be born to parents who have proven they cannot possibly raise or parent a child. This neglected existence is an immense burden to place on a child and on society.”

    That sounds reasonable, right?

    Well, the New York Civil Liberties Union had a cow and filed a friend-of-the-court brief when Pendleton filed her appeal. They argues that the Family Court judge had effectively ordered the couple to abstain from sex, use birth control or be sterilized.

    I say: “Yeah. And?”

    The Family Court judge had put forth that her ruling to prohibit Pendleton from having more children was allowed by a section of law that allows the court to impose medical treatment.

    The appeals panel rejected that and overturned the ruling that Pendleton be prohibited from having more children until she can take care of the ones she has. The did not overturn the finding of the Family Court judge that the children were neglected or the one saying that the parents should be stripped of their parental rights.

    So now the beast is free to go out and have more drug addicted children for the state and foster homes to raise. Good for you Stephanie Pendleton, good for you, and God help your children. I hope they find good homes FAR away from you.

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

    → 1 CommentTags: Drugs · Child Custody · Child Abuse · Family Law

  • Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan Sued
  • It’s A Hard Knock Life For A Homeless Sex Offender In Georgia
  • Druggie Mother Throws Baby At Cop
  • Mother Charged With Felony Abuse After 2 Year Old Ingests Ecstacy
  • City Prosecutor Really Gets Around